We use cookies to understand how you use our site and improve your experience. You can choose which cookies to allow.
See our Privacy Policy and Terms.
Heads up, Double Oak! An op-ed is pushing you to re-elect three council members, saying they're the best for smart growth and keeping the town's vibe and money right. The author thinks the other guys are too anti-development, which could mess with town services and taxes.
At a glance
Declining — being discussed less frequently. 0 mentions in the last 30 days, 1 the 90 before that.
Participating in joint elections is expected to be cost-effective for the town.
Voters and the town administration benefit from a clear and efficiently run election process.
Candidates who advocate for slower development might be seen as harming the town's ability to fund services and keep taxes low, according to the author.
We'll include it in your weekly brief whenever the council takes it up.
The weekly brief for Flower Mound
Every council decision, in plain English — one email a week.
Join 1,131 residents following their cities
Free. Unsubscribe with one click any time. We never sell your email.
As Election Day approaches, the choice for Double Oak voters comes down to one simple question; do we stay on a steady path, or take a risk at a time when major decisions are in front of us? I’m supporting the re-election of Mark Dieterich, Geri Smith, and Dr. K. Favero because they’ve been doing […]
Council members may attend a candidate forum. No official business will be conducted, but it's being treated as an open meeting for transparency.
The council approved the calling of the May general election and authorized joint elections with neighboring counties to streamline the process.